Single judge ordered that the petitioner's case be considered for academic session 2018-19, relying on a previous bench order in Rambha College of Education vs NCTE.
Case to be considered for academic session 2018-19.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
GANPATI COLLEGE OF HIGHER EDUCATION
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr Mayank Manish and Mr Ravi Kant, Advs
versus
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR
..... Respondents
Through: Ms Monika Arora, SC with Mr Harsh Ahuja, Adv for R – 1& 2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by an order passed by the Division Bench in W.P.(C) 3231/2016 ; Rambha College of Education vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr . This position cannot really be disputed by the respondent. The case of the petitioner shall now be considered for the next academic session 2018-19.
Petition disposed of in the above terms.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
SEPTEMBER 05, 2017 / SU
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to admission consideration for the next academic session 2018-19 based on a similar order in Rambha College of Education.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rambha College of Education vs National Council for Teacher Education and AnrFollowed¶15
W.P.(C) 3231/2016, Rambha College of Education vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr
Ganpati College of Higher Education
National Council for Teacher Education
Anr
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
