National Private Iti v. Directorate General of Training & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~239
..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv.
versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING & ANR
..... Respondents Through: Mr C.M. Goyal, Adv. for R-1 with Mr Bhagat Singh, T.O (DGT) Mr Sagar Shivam, Adv. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 06.07.2017
The learned counsel for the respondents concede that applications of the petitioners are either before respondent No. 2 or before respondent No. 1. Be that as it may, all those applications which are pending before respondent No. 2 will be considered as per the norms of respondent No. 2 and thereafter if need be forwarded to respondent No. 1 for necessary action. Those applications which are already with respondent No. 1 shall also be processed expeditiously in order that the case of the petitioners can be considered for the academic session 2017-2018.
The petition stands disposed of.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JULY 06, 2017/A
NATIONAL PRIVATE ITI
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING
INDERMEET KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court