Motion to restore a writ petition dismissed in default was granted after the court was satisfied that the petitioner had sufficient cause for non-appearance.
Recalled the order dated 05.07.2017 and restored the writ petition to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIJAY CHANDRA JHA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person.
versus
DELHI HIGH COURT THROUGH: REGISTRAR GENERAL & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. S.V. Kuthiala, Advs. for DHC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 17.07.2017
CM No. 24524/2017 ( for restoration )
Notice.
Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Advocate accepts notice for the non-applicant.
By this application, the applicant-petitioner who appears in person, has sought restoration of the writ petition, which was dismissed in default by order dated 05.07.2017.
We are satisfied that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause for non-appearance on 05.07.2017.
The order dated 05.07.2017 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number.
The application stands disposed of.
Pg.1 of 2
W.P.(C) No.10112/2015
W.P.(C) No.10112/2015
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
JULY 17, 2017 /pmc
Pg.2 of 2
W.P.(C) No.10112/2015
Vijay Chandra Jha
Delhi High Court
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
