Single judge order on IA No.23930/2015 for impleadment of a builder. The court allowed the application as unopposed. A probate/unfair practice case (TEST.CAS.72/2011) was disposed of by consent settlement signed by the petitioner, objectors, and the builder.
IA No.23930/2015 allowed; the main petition TEST.CAS.72/2011 disposed of based on signed compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
| ATUL SURI | Through: | ..... Petitioner Ms.Manmeet Arora, Mr.Ashish Dholakia, Mr.Apoorv Tripathi and Mr.Prem K. Madan, Advs. |
|---|---|---|
| versus | ||
| STATE & ORS | Through; | ..... Respondents Mr.Jayendera Adv.for R-1. Mr.V.M. Issar, Adv. for R-2&3. Mrs.Anjali J. Manish and Mr.Priyadarshni Manish, Advs. for builder. |
| CORAM: |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 04.04.2016
IA No.23930/2015 (under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC for impleadment of builder-Sh. Suresh Kumar Khetrapal)
TEST.CAS. 72/2011
objectors are present in person in court today. They affirm the compromise and consent to the terms. It is stated that this compromise which is signed and filed in the court will bind the parties i.e. petitioner, objectors and the builder Sh.Suresh Khetrapal agreed to act in terms of the agreed terms and they undertake to this Court to be bound by the terms.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
APRIL 04, 2016 neelam
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Atul Suri
State & Ors
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
