Harender Yadav v. Munni Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Regular Second Appeal was disposed of as compromised pursuant to a settlement agreement dated 29.9.2016 signed by parties before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. A decree was passed based on this agreement, and the court ordered a refund of 50% of the court fee. This appeal involved a dispute subsequently settled via contract.
What did the court decide?
The Regular Second Appeal stood disposed of as compromised. A decree was passed based on the settlement agreement, and 50% of the court fee was refunded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RSA 81/2016 and C.M. No.10550/2016 (stay)
HARENDER YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mishika Singh, Advocate.
versus
MUNNI DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Matloob Alam, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 17.10.2016
- Disputes between the parties have been settled as parties have signed the settlement agreement dated 29.9.2016 before the Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre. Accordingly, parties pray and it is ordered that this Regular Second Appeal will stand disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 29.9.2016 which is a written agreement signed by the parties and therefore falls under Order 23 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). Counsel for the appellant has handed over to the counsel for the respondent a pay order for a sum of Rs.1,17,000/- dated 6.10.2016 bearing no.469984 drawn on Kotak Mahindra Bank for part
RSA No.81/2016
page 1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Regular Second Appeal should be disposed of on the terms of a settlement agreement signed before the court under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Harender Yadav
- respondent
Munni Devi
Coram
Valmikij Mehta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court