if the other requirements of Section 2(l)(iii) are satisfied, there is no reason not to invoke the same, merely because the purpose of letting, or the user, may be residential-cum-professional, or residential-cum-commercial. As aforesaid, in respect of residential-cum-commercial premises, if the nature of the premises is residential, and no part of it is –by its very nature commercial; the mere permitted use thereof for dual purpose i.e. residentialcum-commercial would not save the tenancy from attracting the applicability of Section 2(l)(iii) of the Act. Purely commercial premises would mean premises which are situated in a commercial area, such as, in a shopping complex, a mall or a market area. Generally, such premises would not have attributes of a residential premises – such as, separate bedrooms, living/drawing room, kitchen and bathroom, though, a purely commercial premises, situated in a commercial area may also have facilities, such as toilets & kitchen/pantry. Purely commercial premises would not be given, or taken, for residential use as well, as it is well known that such premises would be more expensive to let out and would be unsuitable for residential use on account of the noise and other kinds of pollution and the attendant nuisance. It would, generally, not be permissible to use commercial premises for residential purpose, and would impinge on privacy of the tenant. Whether the premises, or a part of the tenancy premises are pure commercial by their very nature, would have to be examined in the facts of
