The High Court of Delhi disposed of an appeal involving possession of suit premises by a consent order, granting until 31.12.2017 provided appellants clear arrears and pay subsequent use and occupation charges.
Appellants granted time to vacate suit premises till 31.12.2017 subject to clearing arrears and paying use and occupation charges monthly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Appellants Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate.
DEEPAK @ KALU & ORS
versus
SANGEETA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.S. Chhillar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 20.10.2016
of time to the appellants/defendants for vacating the suit premises upto 31.12.2017. Counsel appears for the respondent/plaintiff and agrees to such time being given subject, however, to the appellants/defendants clearing the arrears within three months and also continuing to pay the use and occupation charges as decreed by the trial court for month by month thereafter till appellants remain in occupation of the suit premises.
RSA No.244/2016 page 1 of 2
that appellants will get time to vacate the suit premises till 31.12.2017 provided appellants clear the entire arrears due and payable as per the judgment of the trial court dated 26.9.2015 within a period of three months from today and will continue to pay thereafter month by month use and occupation charges till the appellants stay in the suit premises. Appellants will also clear all the charges towards electricity and water payable with respect to suit premises till the time appellants are in possession of the suit premises.
order.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
OCTOBER 20, 2016 Ne
page 2 of 2
RSA No.244/2016
Deepak @ Kalu & Ors
Sangeeta
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
