The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the appellant's counsel seeking liberty to file a review petition. The order does not speak to the merits.
Withdrawal of the appeal allowed; pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
SENBO ENGINEERING LTD ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Dipak. K. Nag, Sh. Snehashish Mukherjee and Ms. Apurva Upmanyu, Advocates.
versus
M/S NARINJAN DAS ANAND & SONS & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Sh. M.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 19.04.2016
After some hearing, Sh. Deepak. K. Nag, learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the appeal. He states that a review petition would be filed. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications.
Nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression on the merits of the case.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
APRIL 19, 2016 ájk
Senbo Engineering Ltd
M/s Narinjan Das Anand & Sons & Ors
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
