Wahid Ali v. Shamim Begum
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed a revision petition as infructuous because the petitioner concedes that possession of the property was handed over to the respondent in May 2016.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- RC.REV. 156/2016 WAHID ALI ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Zubeda Begum & Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in person.
versus SHAMIM BEGUM ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH O R D E R % 22.08.2016
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, submits that the possession of the property has been handed over to the landlord in May, 2016. The present petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
JAYANT NATH, J.
AUGUST 22, 2016/v
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
WAHID ALI
- respondent
SHAMIM BEGUM
Coram
JAYANT NATH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court