Appeal on compensation computation under Motor Vehicles Act. Single Judge upheld enhancement of loss of future earnings award using a multiplier of 11, despite finding contributory negligence, ordering deposit by insurance company.
Compensation enhanced by ₹3,06,600 to be deposited by insurance company with interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Date of Decision: 12th February, 2016
SAMUNDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Adv. (appearance not given).
versus
INDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT
R.K.GAUBA, J (ORAL):
MAC APP. No.171/2007 Page 1 of 3
MAC APP. No.171/2007 Page 2 of 3
Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121].
R.K. GAUBA
(JUDGE)
FEBRUARY 12, 2016 neelam
MAC APP. No.171/2007 Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for loss of future earnings was inadequate.
Whether the multiplier claim should be computed based on retirement date despite the appellant's contributory negligence.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.Referred¶18
Sarla Verma (Smt.) & Ors. v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., (2009) 6 SCC 121 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SAMUNDER SINGH
INDER SINGH
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
