Dismissed
Tejpal Singh v. State
Delhi HCLPA/630/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi dismissed an intra-court appeal against a Single Judge's order that had adjourned a writ petition and reserved it for hearing on 15.11.2016, holding that interference before merits were considered was unwarranted.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as the writ petition required further hearing on merits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~22
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
| + LPA 630/2016 |
||
|---|---|---|
| TEJPAL SINGH | Through: versus |
..... Appellant Mr.Suraj Rathi with Mr.Siddharth Singh and Mr.Rajiv Singh Pilania, Advs. |
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Through: | Mr.Tushar Sannu, Adv. for Mr.Rahul | |
| Mehra, Sr.Standing Counsel for the GNCTD. |
||
| SI Sandeep Kumar, P.S./Connaught Place. |
¶4
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
¶5
O R D E R % 11.11.2016
¶6
CM No.42001/2016 ( exemption )
¶7
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶8
CM stands disposed of.
¶9
LPA No.630/2016
¶10
- Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
TEJPAL SINGH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
AI extract
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court