Two appeals were dismissed as not pressed after one of the appellants' counsel informed the Court that she was instructed not to proceed with the appeals regarding allotment of space for squatters.
Present appeals dismissed as not pressed; Town Vending Committee directed to consider representations within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
w
Versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL,COUNCIL & ORS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Addl. Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Mananjay Mishra, Advocate and Mr. Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC. Mr. Swati Singh Malik -and Mr. .Harsh Nagar, Advocates for R-3.
Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
ORDER
% 29.11.2016
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that since the names of the appellants herein do not find mention in the list of 628 unauthorised squatters for allotment of space on lottery basis, which was prepared by New Delhi Municipal Corporation in the year 2011-2012 pursuant to the direction passed by the Supreme Court of India vide order dated 01.05.2012, she has instructions not to press the present appeals, however, she prays that the Town Vending Committee of NDMC be directed to considerthe representationsof the appellants herein with a reasonable time.
Learned counsel for the NDMC has no objectionto the same. Counsel, on instructions,also submits that the representationsof the appellants shall be considered by the Town Vending Committee withineight weeks from today.
Accordingly,presentappeals stand dismissedas not pressed in
6)
view of above.
Dasti, as prayed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
VINOD GOEL, J
NOVEMBER 29, 2016
"sk"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeals filed by squatters claiming allotment of space on lottery basis should be adjudicated when not pressed?
The appellants (628 unauthorised squatters)
New Delhi Municipal Council
GNCTD
G.S. Sistani
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
