Partly allowed
Jagat Singh v. Hotel Taj Palace
Delhi HCLPA/47/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A one-line order where the Delhi High Court deferred the adjudication of the appeal in the interest of justice, directing re-notification on a specified future date.
What did the court decide?
Adverse order deferred. Re-notify on 02.08.2024.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
- $~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶2
- FAO 178/2016
¶3
- M/S UTILITY POWERTECH LIMITED ..... Appellant
¶4
Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
CHHEDNA DEVI ..... Respondent
¶7
Through: Ms. Mamta Garg, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar and Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advs. for R-3.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
¶10
O R D E R % 24.04.2024
¶11
- None appears on behalf of the appellant.
¶12
- In the interest of justice, adverse orders are deferred.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M/S UTILITY POWERTECH LIMITED
- respondent
CHHEDNA DEVI
Coram
AI extract
Shalinder Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court