The Single Bench of the High Court of Delhi observed that the Revenue has not pressed thisAppeal and dismissed the same as per the provisions. The case involves Indian Income Tax law and Service Tax or GST issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
versus
DENSO FARIDABAD PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr Salil Kapoor and Mr Sumit Lalchandani, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 13.01.2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 13, 2016/MK
Commissioner of Income Tax
Denso Faridabad Pvt Ltd.
S. Muralidhar
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
