The Revenue's appeal against an income-tax order was dismissed as it was not pressed because the appellant accepted a circular recorded satisfaction without pursuing the matter.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 22
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL-2) ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.
versus
SATKAR ROADLINES PVT. LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS ADEN MARKETING PVT. LTD.). Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 15.01.2016
No. 24/2015 dated 31st December, 2015 issued by the Central Board of
Direct Taxes on the subject “Recording of satisfaction note under Section
158BD/153C of the Act”, this appeal is not pressed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 15, 2016/ Rk
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-2)
Satkar Roadlines Pvt. Ltd. (now Aden Marketing Pvt. Ltd.)
S.Muralidhar
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
