This appeal by the Revenue against an ITAT order allowing exemption for casual and non-recognized courses courses was dismissed. The Court held the matter covered by Delhi Music Society vs. DGIT, finding no substantial question of law.
Appeal by Revenue dismissed. Exemption allowed; delay in filing appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-(E) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.Roy Chaudhuri, Advocate.
versus
YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
CM No. 27557/2016 (Exemption)
CM No. 27558/2016 (Condonation of delay in filing appeal)
ITA 509/2016
Page 1 of 2
ITA 509/2016
S.MURALIDHAR, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
AUGUST 02, 2016 kk
Page 2 of 2
ITA 509/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ITAT erred in deleting the addition made by the AO on account of income earned from conducting casual and non-recognized courses.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Delhi Music Society vs. DGITApplied¶20
_Delhi Music Society vs. DGIT (2013) 357 ITR 265 (Del.)_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Commissioner of Income Tax-(E)
Young Women's Christian Association of Delhi
S. Muralidhar
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
