In this income tax appeal, the Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The tax effect was noted to be less than Rs. 20 lacs as per CBDT Circular. No substantive appeal was heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
DLF ESTATE DEVELOPERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Roopali Gupta, Advocate alongwith Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Since the tax effect in this case is less than Rs. 20 lacs - the amount specified in the Central Board Direct Taxes (CBDT) Circular of 10.12.2015 (actual tax deemed on Rs. 20,08,375/- -working out little over Rs. 6 lacs).
Learned counsel submits that the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 25, 2016 sapna
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 3.
DLF Estate Developers Ltd.
S. Ravindra Bhat
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
