This order allowed Income Tax Appeal ITA 222/2016 based on precedent, holding no substantial question of law arose per CIT v. Kabul Chawla (2016).
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
15.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -DELHI-8 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel and Ms Laxmi Gurung, Junior Standing counsel.
versus
SHRI SANTOSH KUMAR GARG ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE R. K. GAUBA
O R D E R
% 01.04.2016 CM No.11990/2016
ITA 222/2016
S. MURALIDHAR, J
R. K. GAUBA, J
APRIL 01, 2016/ MK
ITA 222/2016 Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CIT v. Kabul Chawla [2016] 380 ITR 573 (Del)Followed¶16
CIT v. Kabul Chawla [2016] 380 ITR 573 (Del)
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-Delhi-8
Shri Santosh Kumar Garg
S. Muralidhar
R. K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
