Division Bench disposed of an income tax exemption application and dismissed a plea for condonation of 917 days of delay in re-filing the appeal, rejecting the Department's explanation.
Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; application for condonation of delay dismissed; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior standing counsel with Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Jr. Standing counsel.
versus
POORVA SANSKRITI KENDRA ..... Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 08.03.2016
CM APPL 8468/2016 (for exemption)
ITA No. 183/2016 & CM APPL No. 8469/2016 (for delay of 917 days
in re-filing the appeal)
ITA No. 183/2016
Page 1 of 2
for the Revenue and the failure by the earlier counsel to inform the Department about the appeal lying in defect.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
MARCH 08, 2016 Rk
ITA No. 183/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for exemption allowed subject to exceptions or dismissed.
Whether the delay of 917 days in re-filing the appeal should be condoned.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)
POORVA SANSKRITI KENDRA
S.MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
