Revenue counsel stated the tax effect was less than Rs.20 lakhs and the appeal was not pressed in view of CIRD 21/2015. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DEL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior Standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra K. Singh, Mr.Shikhar Garg and Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates.
versus
KUBER MUTUAL BENEFIT LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 04.01.2016
Rs.20 lakhs. He states that in view of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10th
December 2015 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, he does not press this appeal.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 04, 2016/ dn
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DEL
KUBER MUTUAL BENEFIT LTD.
S. MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
