The bench disposed of the appeal in limine. Counsel for the appellant stated that a prior judgment in Great Eastern Exports answered the issue in favor of the Revenue, rendering the appeal unsustainable.
The appeal is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~
AMIRA FOODS INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R % 10.02.2016
that the judgment in Great Eastern Exports v. CIT [2011] 332 ITR 14 (Del)
has answered the issue raised in favour of the Revenue. Accordingly he states that the present appeal does not survive.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2016/ dn
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Great Eastern Exports v. CITReferred¶9
Great Eastern Exports v. CIT [2011] 332 ITR 14 (Del)
AMIRA FOODS INDIA LIMITED
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
S. MURALIDHAR
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
