Videocon Telecommunications Ltd. v. Tower Vision India Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
INDUS TOWERS LTD Respondent Through Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr Dinesh Agnani, Mr Nishant Menon, Mr Abhishek Birthray, Mrshafiq Ahmed, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORDER % 15.07.2016
CM 24676/2016 in FAOfOS) (COMMV46/2016 CM 24679/2016 in FAO(OSI (COMMY 47/2016 CM 24682-83/2016 in FAOIOSI (COMMI 48/2016 CM 24686-87/2016 in FAOIOSI (COMM) 49/2016
Allowed subject to all just exceptions
FAO(OS) iCOMMI 46/2016 & CM 24675/2016 & 24677/2016 FAQ(OSI (COMM) 47/2016 & CM 24678/2016 & 24680/2016 FAOIOSI (COMMI 48/2016 & CM 24681/2016 & 24684/2016 FAorosyrcoMMi 49/2016 & cm 24685/2016
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties on both sides at some length, it is ) agreed that the following order be passed:
We are making it clear that we have not made any observations on the merits of the matter and the learned Single Judge shall render his decision independently. This
consent order is only for the interim period and shall not come in the way of the learned Single Judge in any manner in his arriving at a decision on merits and is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties as argued before the learned Single Judge.
The appeals stand disposed of on the above terms. Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
^LY 15, 2016/ab
Indus Towers Ltd
Badar Durrez Ahmed
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court