Dismissed

Mulakh Raj Jain v. Mahavir Vishwa Vidyapeeth Prabandh Samiti & Ors.

Delhi HC17 Feb 2016FAO(OS)/630/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge bench of the High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal filed 568 days after the order against closing the right to file a written statement. The court held that settlement negotiations did not extend the statutory limitation and the appeal lacked merit.

What did the court decide?

Allowing the appeal challenged, the court dismissed the appeal.

Mulakh Raj Jain Vs Mahavir Vishwa Vidyapeeth… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 630/2015

¶4

..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Alok Bhachawat, Advocate with Ms.Swati Ghildiyar, Advocate

¶5

MULAKH RAJ JAIN

¶6

versus

¶7

MAHAVIR VISHWA VIDYAPEETH PRABANDH SAMITI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: None

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

¶9

O R D E R % 17.02.2016

¶10

We find no merit in the appeal which lays a challenge to an order dated September 04, 2015 dismissing Chamber Appeal filed by the appellant against the order dated January 09, 2015 passed by the learned Joint Registrar closing right of the appellant to file the written statement. The Chamber Appeal was filed with a delay of 568 days.

¶11

The record of the suit would show that the appellant had filed a caveat and had entered appearance when the suit was listed for admission on August 12, 2013, on which date summons were accepted by counsel for the appellant. As per the Code of Civil Procedure written statement ought to have been filed within 30 days and as per Rule 1 of Order 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon showing sufficient cause, within further 60 days. Beyond the period of 90 days an exceptional cause had to be shown. No

¶12

FAO (OS) No.630/2015

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

written statement being filed till January 09, 2014 and no application filed for extension of time to file the written statement, on January 09, 2014 the learned Joint Registrar closed the right of the appellant to file the written statement, against which Chamber Appeal was filed with a delay of 568 days.

¶15

The only point urged is that the parties were trying to settle the dispute is neither here nor there because as pleaded in the appeal the settlement failed on April 27, 2015 and in spite thereof the Chamber Appeal was filed on August 17, 2015. Besides, when the learned Joint Registrar had passed the order on January 09, 2014, pending settlement talks, a written statement ought to have been filed immediately thereafter with an application to extend the time to file the same and with a prayer that the written statement be taken on record.

¶16

The appeal is dismissed.

¶17

No costs.

¶18

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

¶19

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶20

FEBRUARY 17, 2016 mamta

¶21

FAO (OS) No.630/2015

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Mulakh Raj Jain v. Mahavir Vishwa Vidyapeeth Prabandh Samiti & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mulakh Raj Jain v. Mahavir Vishwa Vidyapeeth Prabandh Samiti & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Kamal Sethi Vs Sh S K Sethi

M/S Home Stores (India) Ltd. Vs M/S Pacific Maintenance Services Pvt. Ltd.

M/S Hi Tek Engineers & Ors. Vs Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Counsel (Tifac)

Harish Virmani & Anr. Vs Ashok Virmani & Ors.

M/S Sparsh Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Dev Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Sushil Kumar Palanwal Vs Mohd Imraan

Gurcharan Singh Vs Saraswati Mishra & Ors.

Metro Builders (Orissa) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indian Oil Corportion Limited (Refinery Division)

Principal Commissioner of Income TAX-O9 Vs M/S Tinna Finex Ltd.

Geeta Gulati & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

B.S. Dhillon & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Indian Medical Association Vs Union of India

Sonological Society of India Vs Union of India & Anr.

Indian Radiological and Imaging Association (Iria) Vs Union of India and Anr.