An appeal challenging a refusal to issue a contempt notice was terminated after negotiations resulted in an agreed settlement term between parties that encompasses the pending suit. The settlement document is required to be signed by both.
Proceedings in the appeal terminated; settlement terms to be put in writing and signed by both parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
ALTICOR INC & ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Advocate with Ms.Tusha Malhotra, Mr.Kshitij Parashar, Advocates versus
ZYDUS WELLNESS LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Bijal Chattrapati, Advocate with Ms.Namita Kochhar, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 16.03.2016
page 1 of 2
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 16, 2016 ‘skb’
page 2 of 2
FAO(OS) 549/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings in an appeal challenging a refusal to issue a contempt notice should be terminated upon settling of terms between parties.
Altacor Inc & Anr
Zydus Wellness Limited & Anr
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
