The court dismissed two sets of appeals and applications as not pressed after the appellants withdrew them, citing that the substantive issues were already seized of by the learned Arbitrator.
The appeals and applications were dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AM UL YA
V
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
ORDER % 05.02.2016
CM No.l 1487/2015 in FAQ fOS)No.333/2015 CM No. 11527/2015 in FAQ TOSl No.337/2015 CMNo.ll571/2015m.FAO(OSlNo.339/2015
FAG rOS)No.333/2015 & CM No.l 1488/2015 FAQ rOSlNo.337/2015 & CM No.l 1528/2015 FAQ (081 No.339/2015 & CM No.l 1572/2015
learned Arbitrator.
PRADEE^NA^LltAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 05,2016 mamta
FAO (OS) No.333/2015 & Conn. Matters page 3 of3
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
