This order records the withdrawal of an appeal against an order under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court granted liberty to seek appropriate remedies and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
M/S TRIPLE A ENGINEERING PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr D.K. Rustagi with Mr Manan Bansal & Mr Mayank Rustagi, Advs.
versus
SHARVAN KUMAR ..... Respondent Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R % 02.12.2016
The learned counsel for the appellant requests for permission to withdraw this appeal inasmuch as an FAO(OS) does not lie against the order sought to be impugned which has been passed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. He, however, seeks liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
DECEMBER 02, 2016 ns
M/S TRIPLE A ENGINEERING PVT LTD
SHARVAN KUMAR
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
