Appeal against dismissal of Order VII Rule 11 application dismissed as infructuous due to settlement between parties. Parties advised to draft written settlement for decree.
Appellant advised to file application in suit annexing written settlement between parties for appropriate decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HAZRAT MAULANA ARSHAD MADANI & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.R.K.Dash, Sr.Adv. instructed by Md.Irshad Hanif, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
page 1 of 2
FAO(OS) 287/2015
CM 9912/2015 (stay)
Dismissed.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 21, 2016
‘ga’
page 2 of 2
FAO(OS) 287/2015
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Maulana Qari Mohammad Usman
Hazrat Maulana Arshad Madani & Ors
Pradeep Nandrajog
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
