Allowed

Surinder Mohan Talwar and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd.

Delhi HC22 Feb 2016FAO(OS)/259/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court set aside a Single Judge order dismissing a Section 34 objection due to delay. Holding that limitation runs from actual receipt of award reasons, the Court allowed restoration of civil applications where arbitral records remain missing.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated Feb 09, 2015 set aside; OMP No.867/2014 and IA 14343/2014 restored for adjudication on merits.

Surinder Mohan Talwar and Anr. Vs Cholamandalam Investment and… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2016)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 259/2015

¶4

SURINDER MOHAN TALWAR AND ANR ..... Appellant Represented by: Appellant No.1 in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.J.L.Joel, Adv.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

¶8

O R D E R % 22.02.2016

¶9

Vide impugned order dated February 09, 2015 980 days delay in filing OMP No.867/2014, an objection under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been dismissed. The reason given by the learned Single Judge is that when the award dated November 21, 2011 was put into execution the appellants were served on November 22, 2013. They would therefore have knowledge of the award.

¶10

The impugned order overlooks the fact that as per Sub-Section (3) of Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act limitation commenced to challenge an award from the date when an arbitral award is received.

¶11

Mere knowledge of an arbitral award sans the reasons in the award is meaningless. It is actionable knowledge which has to be looked into in law.

¶12

page 1 of 2

¶13

FAO(OS) 259/2015

¶14

To untie this knot, on December 07, 2015, after the respondent was served, direction was issued to obtain from the Arbitrator the record of arbitration which has not been received in this Court till date.

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondent, the claimant, states that they contacted the Arbitrator who stated that the record is not traceable with him. 6. Since, in the absence of arbitral record which the learned Arbitrator is unable to produce it would be impossible for this Court to find out as to when did the learned Arbitrator notify the appellants the award dated November 21, 2011, we dispose of the appeal setting aside the impugned order dated February 09, 2015. We declare that there was no need to seek any delay to be condoned for the reason the trigger off date wherefrom limitation had to be commenced has not even commenced.

¶16

OMP No.867/2014 and IA 14343/2014 are restored for adjudication on merits.

¶17

On an application being filed enclosing therewith a certified copy of the present order the OMP and the interim application would be listed by the Registry as per the Roster to the Bench nominated.

¶18

No cost.

¶19

CM 8639/2015 (stay)

¶20

Dismissed as infructuous.

¶21

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

¶22

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶23

FEBRUARY 22, 2016 ‘ga’ FAO(OS) 259/2015

¶24

page 2 of 2

Surinder Mohan Talwar and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surinder Mohan Talwar and Anr. v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Futech Projects (India) Pvt. Limited Vs Abbott Healthcare Pvt. Limited & Anr.

M/S Jainco Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs M/S Dev Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Sparsh Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Dev Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Jainco Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Dev Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Bdr Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company & Anr.

Hi Power Marketing (P) Ltd. & Ors. Vs M/S National Panasonic India (P) Ltd. & Anr.

Bdr Pharmaceuticals International Private Limited Vs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company & Ors.

Shahnaz Ali & Anr. Vs Suresh Kumar Gera & Anr.

Kanwal Kapoor Vs the Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors.

M/S Cantronics Office Equipment Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Jainco Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs M/S Dev Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Sant Ram Vs State

Ajay @ Sunder Pal Vs State

M/S Hindustan Motors Ltd. Vs Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction & Ors.