An appeal pressed by the appellant regarding the impact of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 before the Single Judge was allowed subject to exceptions but ultimately dismissed as not pressed.
Allowed subject to all just exceptions, but dismissed as not pressed by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
PRAMILA GARG & ANR ..... Appellant
Through : Mr Ashok Chhabra
versus
SONU JAIN & ANR ..... Respondents Through : None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
O R D E R
% CM 27141/2016
01.08.2016
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
FAO(OS) 229/2016 & CM 27140/2016 (stay)
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that he would advance arguments with regard to the impact of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 before the
learned Single Judge. He submits that for this reason, he is not pressing this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
AUGUST 01, 2016 SR
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PRAMILA GARG & ANR
SONU JAIN & ANR
BADAR DURREZ AHMED
ASHUTOSH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
