Appeal against an impugned order was disposed of on the basis of a settlement agreement dated 18 March 2016 arrived at the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
UMA SHANKAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra and Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocates
versus
TATA MOTORS FINANCE LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 28.07.2016
Learned counsel for appellant submits that this appeal needs to be disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement 18th March, 2016 arrived at Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre .
Learned counsel for respondent joins the counsel for appellant in making the said prayer.
In view of the above, this appeal and the application are disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement of 18th March, 2016 as it is stated by both the sides that the aforesaid Settlement Agreement has been acted.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
JULY 28, 2016 s
Uma Shankar Gupta
Tata Motors Finance Ltd
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
