The enforcement petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the decree holder, who sought liberty to enforce a subsequently published award; earlier hearing date cancelled.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty accorded for future application regarding subsequently published award. Earlier date cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
..... Decree Holder Through : Mr Puneet Bajaj, Adv versus
SATNAM SINGH & ANR.
..... Judgement Debtors Through : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 02.11.2016 EA (OS) No.723/2016 in Ex.P.44/2014 and EA (OS) No.124/2015
The learned counsel for the decree holder seeks to withdraw the present petition as he states that the award sought to be enforced has been set aside. He further seeks liberty to file an appropriate application for enforcement of the award published subsequently. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Consequently, the earlier date fixed i.e. 17.01.2017 stands cancelled.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
NOVEMBER 02, 2016 M
L & T Finance Ltd.
Satnam Singh & Anr.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
