The High Court of Delhi dismissed an execution petition for non-prosecution, noting that the decree holder failed to take effective attachment steps or verify property titles correctly, and that the petitioner maintained the proceedings only for the sake of pendency.
Dismissal of the execution petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
SADANAND A. SHETTY ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. C. Mukund and Mr. Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Advs.
Versus
PRADEEP JAIN & ANR ..... Judgement Debtors Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
% 02.11.2016
EX.P. 222/2006
Page 1 of 2
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
NOVEMBER 02, 2016/ bs..
Page 2 of 2
EX.P. 222/2006
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this execution petition should be dismissed for lack of effective steps by the decree holder.
Whether the title search undertaken applies to the properties situated in New Friends Colony.
SADANAND A. SHETTY
PRADEEP JAIN
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
