This order dismisses an election petition as withdrawn based on the petitioner's undertaking that the statement shall not be used against the respondent. The court dismissed the petition and confirmed parties are bound by their statements.
Election petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SB-1
DR. ANITA BABBAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal and Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Advocates along with Dr. Anita Babbar, petitioner in person. versus
SHRI. O.P. BABBAR AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok Kashyap, Advocate alongwith Sh. O.P. Babbar, respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
O R D E R % 19.02.2016
The statement of Dr. Anita Babbar (petitioner) as well as Sh. O.P. Babbar (respondent no.2) has been recorded separately today in the Court.
It is also undertaken by the petitioner that nothing in this election petition shall be used against the respondent.
In view of the statement of petitioner, election petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Parties shall remain bind by their statements.
DEEPA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2016
sapna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a statement of withdrawal by the petitioner in an election petition can be accepted to dismiss the matter.
DR. ANITA BABBAR
SHRI. O.P. BABBAR AND ORS.
DeeP ShaRma
Sharp Ma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
