Shanti Devi v. Sanjay Goyal
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit transferred to subordinate court. Plaintiff absent on calls. Defendant counsel consented to transfer via telephone communication, citing Notification under Act 23 of 2015.
What did the court decide?
Suit transferred to District Judge (North West), Rohini Courts Complex for further proceedings on 28th March, 2016.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(OS) 846/2011
SHANTI DEVI ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
SANJAY GOYAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R % 11.01.2016
- On the first call, none was present on behalf of the plaintiff.
Same is the position on the second call. Mr. Aggarwal, learned counsel for the defendant submits that in the interregnum, he has telephonically contacted Mr. Sunil Malhotra, counsel for the plaintiff, who has stated that he is out of station and that he has no objection to the suit being transferred to the subordinate court vested with the territorial jurisdiction in that regard.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SHANTI DEVI
- respondent
SANJAY GOYAL
Coram
HIMA KOHLI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court