obligations under the Agreement to Sell dated 30.11.2012, MOU dated 4.3.2013 and the Receipt/agreement dated 18.3.2013. He however disputes the contention of the defendants that there has been a deliberate delay on the part of the plaintiff in discharging its obligations under the contract. He states that vide Agreement to Sell dated 30.11.2012 executed between the defendant No.2 and Shri Dharamvir Singh, [predecessor-in-title of the defendant No.1(a), (b) & (c)], the parties had agreed that the owner of the subject landholding shall sell the same to the defendant No.2 for a total sale consideration of Rs.4,68,85,417/- and at the time of executing the said contract, part sale consideration of Rs.50.00 lacs was received by Shri Dharamvir Singh. Subsequently, a MOU dated 4.3.2013 was executed between the plaintiff/company (who had stepped into the shoes of the defendant No.2), and Shri Dharamvir Singh, whereunder both the parties had agreed to abide by the terms and conditions of the sale as recorded in the Agreement to Sell dated 30.11.2012. This was followed by the execution of the Receipt dated 18.3.2013, by Shri Dharamvir Singh, who had acknowledged having received a sum of Rs.50.00 lacs from the plaintiff, towards part sale consideration and undertaken inter alia that he would execute the sale deed within the period one year from the date of execution of the Agreement to Sell, i.e., on or before 30.11.2013.
