The High Court of Delhi accepted a settlement agreement between the plaintiff and respondent under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC and disposed of the suit accordingly, granting a 50% court fee refund.
Settlement accepted; suit disposed of; 50% refund of court fees granted to petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10.
NUTRILITE AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED.... Defendant Through: Mr. M.K.Miglani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI O R D E R % 24.05.2016 I.A. No. 6568/2016 This is an application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC to record their settlement. The application is signed by the representatives of the parties and their respective counsels. It is also supported by the affidavit of Varsha Chaudhary, Constituted Attorney of plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Deepak Kumar, one of the Directors of the defendant company. The terms of settlement appear to be fair, just and reasonable and there is no impediment in accepting the same. Accordingly, the settlement is accepted and shall continue to bind the parties. The suit stands disposed of in terms of the said settlement. Since disputes have been settled prior to commencement of trial, the petitioner is entitled to 50% refund of the court fees.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
MAY 24, 2016
sl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether theHigh Court should accept the settlement agreement filed through application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ALTICOR INC & ANR
NUTRILITE AGRO PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
