The Delhi High Court held that the suit is not a commercial dispute under the 2015 Act. Due to pecuniary jurisdiction limits, the suit was transferred to the District & Sessions Judge (North) Rohini Courts.
Transfer of suit file to the District & Sessions Judge (North) Rohini Courts, Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
KRISHNA DAWAR ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. P.Chaudhary, Adv.
versus
AJAY MONGA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. N.L.Gupta, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. for D-3 to 5. Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Addl. Standing Counsel GNCTD with Ms. Sana Babbar, Adv. for D-6.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 25.02.2016
value of rupees one crore cannot be tried by this Court. Accordingly, this suit is transferred for decision to the jurisdictional Court under the District & Sessions Judge (North) Rohini Courts, Delhi.
Rohini Courts, Delhi on 5th April, 2016. Suit file be made available to the District & Sessions Judge (North) Rohini Courts, Delhi, on the date fixed.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 25, 2016 ib
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the subject matter of the suit is a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Whether the pecuniary jurisdiction limits under the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act 2015 apply to this suit.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishna Dawar
Ajay Monga & Ors.
Valmiaki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
