Learned counsel argued for transfer of a suit valued at 22 lacs to the subordinate District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts. The court ordered the transfer and fixed appearance date.
Suit transferred to District Judge (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Delhi; parties directed to appear on 3rd February, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that suit is valued at `22 lacs for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction, hence, the same be transferred to the subordinate court of competent jurisdiction in view of the notification no.27187/DHC/Orgl. dated 24.11.2015 under Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015.
It is further submitted that suit be transferred to the District Judge (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Delhi. Ordered accordingly. Parties shall appear before the District Judge (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts Complex, Delhi on 3rd February, 2016. Registry to transmit the file to the transferee court forthwith.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JANUARY 06, 2016 ga
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit valued at 22 lacs be transferred to the subordinate court of competent jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
NEELAM RANI
PRIYANKA KAUSHIK & ANR
A.K. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
