The suit for permanent injunction regarding trademark infringement was dismissed by the Court as it was filed in default. The plaintiff failed to appear on the day hearing for recording of evidence was scheduled, and no witness was examined by the defendant.
The suit was dismissed in default for want of prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
Versus
M/S IVES DRUGS (I) PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Aly Mirza and Mr. Kulish Tanwar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
% 20.07.2016
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
JULY 20, 2016/ bs..
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit for permanent injunction should be dismissed for want of prosecution given the absence of the plaintiff's counsel.
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
