The Court dismissed a civil suit and accompanying applications in default of the plaintiff, who failed to appear despite multiple summons.
The Suit and associated applications were dismissed in default due to the Plaintiff's non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
RITA MALHOTRA ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
ASHOK KUMAR BAHL AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi and Mr. Raghav Pandey, Advocates for Mr. Shiv Prakash Pandey, Advocate Mr. S. Nanawati, Advocate for D-3 with D-3 in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 06.12.2016
Inspite of the passover, none has appeared for the plaintiff till 4.25 p.m. It is noted that the plaintiff has not been appearing before the Joint Registrar over the last several dates of hearing starting with 13.10.2015. The suit alongwith the applications filed therewith is dismissed in default.
R.K.GAUBA, J
DECEMBER 06, 2016 yg
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
