Ella Sen & Anr. v. Bibha Rani Ray & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24.
Through: Ms. Mamta Tiwari, Advocate.
versus
BIBHA RANI RAY & ORS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Shahan Mahajan, Advocate for defendants No.1 & 2. Defendant No.3 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R % 09.02.2016
I.A. No. 1439/2016
This application has been filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The same has been signed by the parties and their respective counsel and is also supported by the affidavit of Ms.Ella Sen (plaintiff No.1), Dr. Usha Mehta (plaintiff No.2), Ms. Bibha Rani Ray (defendant No.1), Ms. Indrani Lahiri (defendant No.2) and Ms. Sudershani Ray Abott (defendant No.3). A copy of the settlement agreement arrived by the parties on 22.01.2016 has also been placed on record. The parties had appeared before this Court on 25.01.2016 and stated that they had entered into the said settlement. The terms of the settlement appear to be fair, just and reasonable and there is no impediment in accepting the same.
Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement arrived between the parties. The parties shall remain bound by the same. I.A. No. 1440/2016
By this application, the plaintiff seeks return of the original settlement agreement dated 22.01.2016 signed between the parties.
Subject to the same being replaced with a certified copy, the same be returned.
Since the suit stands disposed of at reasonably early stage of the proceedings, 50% of the Courts Fees be refunded.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2016 B.S. Rohella
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit be decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.
Whether the original settlement agreement be returned to the plaintiff.
Whether 50% of the court fees be refunded.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court