The Delhi High Court dismissed an application to enhance suit value per se. It also transferred the suit to the District Judge (South East) and listed a contempt matter for the Roster Division Bench.
Application to enhance suit value dismissed with liberty; suit transferred to District Judge (South East).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MASTER TANISH SUBRAMANIAM & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Aditi Pandey, Ms. Malany and Ms. Nishtha Arora, Advs.
Versus
HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: Ms. Amrita Singh, Adv. for D-2. Mr. P.V. Dinesh and Mr. Rajendra Beniwal, Advs. for D-1. Ms. Vishnu Mehra, Adv. for D-3. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. for contemnor.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW O R D E R
% 15.07.2016 CCP(O) No.33/2016
CS(OS) 1872/2000
Page 1 of 3
IA No.25198/2015 (of plaintiffs u/O 6 R-17 CPC)
CS(OS) 1872/2000
Page 2 of 3
CS(OS) 1872/2000 & IAs No.2178/2016 (of D-2 u/S 151 CPC), 6663/2007 (u/O 11 R-11 CPC), 14126/2014 (u/S 151 CPC), 22774/2014 (of D-3 u/S 151 CPC) & 17506/2015 (for adjournment of cross-examination of DW1)
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
JULY 15, 2016 bs..
Page 3 of 3
CS(OS) 1872/2000
Master Tanish Subramaniam & Ors.
Hewlett Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
