Plaintiff sought leave to withdraw suit to file in a competent court. Court dismissed suit as withdrawn, vacated interim order, and allowed desealing of seized goods by defendant.
Dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order vacated. Goods to be desealed by defendant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31.
KISAN MOULDINGS LTD
..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. D.K. Yadav, Advocate
versus
MUKESH SINGHAL
..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Abhishek Bansal and O.P. Bansal, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
O R D E R
%
13.05.2016
Learned counsel for the plaintiff, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the suit and to file the same in a competent court having jurisdiction. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
The interim order stands vacated. The goods seized by the Local Commissioner which are lying in superdari with the defendant may be desealed by the defendant and put to use.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
sr
MAY 13, 2016
VIPIN SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
