Shri Deepan Kumar v. Shri Jai Prakash Aggarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS)…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SHRI DEEPAN KUMAR ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus SHRI JAI PRAKASH AGGARWAL ..... Defendant Through: None CORAM:
DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
O R D E R % 02.12.2016
From the perusal of the plaint as well as memo of parties, it revealed that valuation of the suit property for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction is less than two crores and defendant is situated at Ashok Vihar which falls within the jurisdiction of North District as such the matter be sent before the Ld District & Session Judge (North District), Rohini Court.
In view of notification no 27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015 & in exercise of powers conferred by Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Act 23 of 2015), which came into force with effect from 26.10.2015 vide Notification No. F. No. L-19015/04/2012-Jus dated 26.10.2015 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs, published in Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3 Sub Section (ii), the present matter stands transferred to the jurisdictional subordinate
courts.
Hence, in view of the circumstances, let the matter be sent to the Ld District & Session Judge, (North District) Rohini Court. Parties be directed to appear before the Court of Ld District & Session Judge (North District), Rohini Court on 20.02.2017.
The suit files be made available to the Ld District & Session Judge (North District) at Rohini Court on the date fixed.
DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
DECEMBER 02, 2016 SK
Satinder Kumar Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court