Neeraj Vinay Bansal v. Mr Sudhir Kumar Tyagi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi disposed of applications I.A. Nos. 2659/2018 and 2660/2018 as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEERAJ VINAY BANSAL
..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Mayank Aggarwal, Advocate.
versus
MR SUDHIR KUMAR TYAGI & ORS ..... Defendants Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 26.02.2018
I.A. Nos.2659/2018 (for recalling of order dated 2.12.2016) and 2660/2018 (for condonation of delay of 420 days in filing I.A. No.2659/2018
These applications, after arguments, are disposed of as not
pressed.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2018 Ne
Neeraj Vinay Bansal
Mr Sudhir Kumar Tyagi
Valmi Ji Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court