The Court transferred a suit to the jurisdictional District Court under Section 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 due to pecuniary jurisdiction limits.
Suit transferred to District Court; parties to appear on 18 March 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAHENDER KEHAR ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Aviral Tiwari, Advocate.
Versus
M/S SUNRISE CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Rachna Aggrawal, Advocate for defendant No.1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 04.02.2016
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2016/ Ne
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to transfer a suit exceeding pecuniary jurisdiction of the High Court to the District Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahender Kehar
M/S Sunrise Constructions & Ors.
Valmiki J. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
