The bench transferred an ordinary suit to the District & Sessions Judge (South East) under the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 due to lack of pecuniary jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SH. JAGMOHAN NATH KAPOOR ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava and Ms. Sharmistha Ghosh, Advocates.
versus
SH. MANMOHAN NATH KAPOOR ..... Defendant Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R % 18.04.2016
Sessions Judge (South East), Saket Courts, New Delhi.
East), Saket Courts, New Delhi on 23rd May, 2016. Suit file be made available to the District & Sessions Judge (South East), Saket Courts, New
Delhi, on the date fixed.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
APRIL 18, 2016 ib
3 provisions across 3 enactments
SH. JAGMOHAN NATH KAPOOR
SH. MANMOHAN NATH KAPOOR
VALMIKI J MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
