Dismissed
S.Haripal Singh v. UOI Ac+
Delhi HCCS(OS)/117/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order dismisses a suit for interest recovery as the plaintiffs failed to lead evidence on material issues. The court held that the order closing plaintiff evidence dated April 26, 2016, had attained finality.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed on grounds of failure to lead evidence.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CS(OS) 117/2005
¶4
- S.HARIPAL SINGH & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal & Ms. Simran Jeet, Advs.
¶5
- Versus
¶6
- UOI & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda & Mr. Pranav Agarwal, Advs.
¶7
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
¶8
- O R D E R
¶9
- % 08.11.2016
¶10
- This order is in continuation of the earlier order dated 5th October, 2016.
¶11
- The position today remains the same as on 5th October, 2016.
¶12
- The counsel for the plaintiffs states that the plaintiffs be granted adjournment to move an appropriate application. It is also stated that no Issue of limitation has been framed in the suit. It is yet further stated that it is not as if the plaintiffs have not led any evidence; the plaintiffs had tendered in evidence the affidavit by way of examination-in-chief of one of their witnesses and who also was partly cross-examined.
Coram
AI extract
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court