Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr. v. Sarath Kumar Reddy G
Delhi HCCS(OS)/1141/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18-OS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiff
Through: None
versus
SARATH KUMAR REDDY G ..... Defendant Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Advocate with Mr. Himanshu Harbola and Mr. Ketan Madan, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 08.05.2017 I.A.5568/2017 (by defendant u/O IX R 13 CPC) I.A.5569/2017 (by defendant u/s 5 of the Limitation Act) I.A.5570/2017 (by defendant u/O XXXIX R 1 & 2 CPC)
Issue notice to the non-applicants/plaintiffs, through counsel as well, by all permissible modes, including dasti , on the applicant/defendant taking necessary steps during the course of the day, returnable on 30.05.2017.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
MAY 08, 2017 dn
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the defendant was entitled to be granted ad-interim stay.
Whether notice should be issued against plaintiffs by all permissible modes.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Anr
Sarath Kumar Reddy G
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court