The High Court of Delhi ordered the return of a filed matter to the District & Sessions Judge (South-East), Saket, on the finding that it pertained to that jurisdiction rather than South Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
P.K. HOTA AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through Mr Santosh Kumar, Advocate for D1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R
The present matter has been listed pursuant to the order dated 13.05.2016 passed by the Registrar (Original) stating that the matter has been received from the Court of Ms Anu Malhotra, District & Sessions Judge, (South), Saket, Delhi for the reason that the matter does not pertain to the South District.
In view of this, let the matter be transferred back to the Court of the Learned District & Sessions Judge, (South-East), Saket, Delhi.
List on 19.08.2016 before the concerned Court.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 13, 2016 pkv
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
